: OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS NETWORK ORDER : : : OSA NW ORDER 17 17 February 1988 : |
: #### : ### ## |
: : : : : _THE_GENUS_OF_INSANE_GOVERNMENTS_ : : : (Taken from undated LRH notes. Issued : an OSA NW Order on 17 February 1988.) |
Miscavige, his lawyers, and his Public Relations representatives said that all Guardian Orders were "cancelled", so Scientology simply reissued many as OSA NW Orders. This way, they could keep "tech" by renaming it something else to go with the illusion that the criminals (GO staff) were ousted and the "off-source tech" issues (Guardian Orders) were cancelled. In parallel, Miscavige renamed the GO the "Office of Special Affairs". It's semantics, that's all -- an "acceptable" truth. The OSA issue date is after Hubbard's death in 1984. This proves that Scientology did not disband the Guardian's Office, despite Scientology's claims to the contrary. In reality, both GO and OSA are the same Scientology entity, internally named Division 20. This particular order originates from "an undated LRH note". The date of the order (1988) is four years after Hubbard's death. In this case, the OSA is creating material for itself from recycled LRH archive material. If anyone knows what "IMEC" is, I would like to know. |
: : : : #### # ########## # ### ########## ## ##### ##### # ## : ### ##### #### ## ########## ## ### #### ###### |
Hubbard then applies the tone scale to "any government on Earth today". When something as overgeneralized as the tone scale is applied to such an overgeneralized subject, the resulting analysis is sure to be incorrect in a great many cases. However, that never stopped Hubbard before. So, let's continue on and see where Hubbard is going ... |
: : What do you find? : : A murderer, a non-producer, a thing unable to run engrams : - in short, an insane person. |
|
: : #### : : ### ######### ## ### ######### #### ## ######### #### # : ######### #### ### ### ######### ## ########### ############ : ###### ## ##### #### |
It would be interesting to know what "official" act or acts elicited this observation from Hubbard. Unfortunately, the note is undated, so we'll probably never know. |
: : Definition of an insane person: An individual who is not : personally responsible for his own acts. : : Definition of a public official: An individual who is not : personally responsible for his own acts. : : Result: Insane Government. |
We finally see where Hubbard is going with all of this and it's a whopper of a logical fallacy. An attribute of insanity is irresponsibility. Public officials are irresponsible. Therefore [NOT], Public officials are insane. This is similar to saying that since birds fly and airplanes fly, then birds must be airplanes. With feet planted firmly in flawed logic, Hubbard goes on to declare Government to be insane. In Hubbard's utopia of a Cleared Planet, the insane are subordinate to Hubbard and Scientologists. The insane (and their rules) can be ignored. The insane are "disposed of quietly and without sorrow". This document serves as yet another justification for Snow White (infiltration of Government offices by Scientologists for the purposes of "cleaning up" dirty records). |
: : : : : : ## ### ####### : ####### : : : ####### ## ######## : ###### ###### ## : ###### ## ########### : ############# |
|
: : : : LRH:CSI:jk:ta: |
Hubbard is clearly controlling the actions of the Guardian's Office, despite Scientology's claims to the contrary during the Snow White trial. Hubbard also controlled the Office of Special Affairs. I'm unsure of the meaning of the final colon. Perhaps there was someone else in the chain. |
: : ########### ##### ######### ### #### : ## ## ### ####### ####### : ### ###### ######## |
In fact, this is an internal document that is distributed to every Office of Special Affairs recruit. The "unpublished" section of copyright law seems tailor-made for keeping information hidden from scrutiny: The provision for unpublished works in the copyright law was not meant for hiding a work under a rock in perpetuity. The LRH Library uses this designation for legal harrassment; it is just one more charge which the hapless defendant must address and adds to the cost of litigation. Hubbard said "the purpose of the lawsuit is to harrass", not to win. Scientology punishes its critics by forcing them to pay exorbitant legal fees to defend themselves. |
Send comments to: Perry Scott <perry@ezlink.com>.
(c) 1998 Perry Scott. Non-commercial reproduction, except by the Church of Scientology and its subsidiaries and agents, is granted as long as this copyright statement remains intact.